Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
 
hatter23
16 November 2009 @ 08:41 pm
Spent 2 1/2 hours taping up a room to do trim lines Sunday. Started to paint today and the fucking tape falls off. The lines aren't crisp, and the paint is streaky.

Will have to spend hours just trying to fix it.

Then I get to start again.

FUUUFUFUFCCKK!!!!
 
 
hatter23
16 November 2009 @ 01:28 pm
WASHINGTON — Sarah Palin's new book reprises familiar claims from the 2008 presidential campaign that haven't become any truer over time.

Ignoring substantial parts of her record if not the facts, she depicts herself as a frugal traveler on the taxpayer's dime, a reformer without ties to powerful interests and a politician roguishly indifferent to high ambition.

Palin goes adrift, at times, on more contemporary issues, too. She criticizes President Barack Obama for pushing through a bailout package that actually was achieved by his Republican predecessor George W. Bush – a package she seemed to support at the time.

A look at some of her statements in "Going Rogue," obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its release Tuesday:

Read more... )
 
 
hatter23
09 November 2009 @ 09:26 pm


It is a staple of the writers of the cyberpunk genre and culture that change is speeding up. That we are technoshocked and find our experience increasingly remote.

I think this is a myth. A big fat lie they tell themselves. Don't get me wrong I read these writers because they make cultural observations and insights that seem beyond the reach of normal mainstream writers. However their mindview comes with cultural baggage, and I truly think this is one of those bags that they seem to fail to notice is empty.

Take a look at 1994 versus 2001 versus 2009. The cultural and technological differences between 1994 and 2001 seem pretty big when compared to 2002 and now.

Now lets double that. Look at the differences between 15 yeaars ago, 1994 versus 30 years ago, 1979.  Think about the differences between 1979 and 1994. In 1979 nearly no one owned a PC, offices were still mostly manual, broadcast TV was three channels and perhaps three more UHF stations if you were luck. Cars still used carberators. Gays still had to be in the closet. The term "oral sex" was confined to the pages of Playboy and private conversations; white males held absolute dominance in national politics. Compare that to 1994; cable tv, computerized fuel injection, the automated office, PCs were becoming household appliances with the web, rainbow pride was well known in the news.....less difference between 1994 and now than 1994 and 1979.

Lets double that again.

Sure 1979 cars had carberators, but the Japanense had unseated the US as the number one exporter, automatic tramsmission and cateletic conveters were standard. Two seperate markets, one interested in smaller efficient cars and some who wanted larger gas hogs Office work was the standard. Everone but the homeless had a telephone. News and entertainment come from a screen in peoples homes.

As opposed to 1949....the US was on the top of the world. Cars came in one size...big. Telephone service was sometimes scarce in rural communities. TV was nearly unheard of. Few people worked in an office.

And double it again 1889 versus 1949. We have far more in common with the motion picture viewing, modern thought, commuting by car person of 1949 than the horse and buggy agrarian 1889 has with 1949.

So the whole "speeding up" thing is IMNSHO a myth.

 

 


 
 
hatter23



October came this year, but it was a bumpy one, between Erin's health, poor weather, and craptastic finances...I couldn't make my favorite time of year everything I could have hoped, but still had a very nice time. Mother, pictured here, was the usual centerpiece of my window display that people seem to enjoy every year.

Now trick or treaters, for a childfree person, I like the ritual....a lot. I not only give out a fun sized chocolate, but also a small toy, perhaps a Halloween pencil, or some spider rings. The third set of kids I got were exactly the kind I hate. No costume, not even a Halloween themed bag, just nasty ghetto 13 year old coming up on their bikes, and I frankly just gave them the lamest candy I had. They then tried to demand something else, I told them "the good candy is for kids in costumes" they then tried to threaten me and when I just stared at them, they took off, assholes. I blow $50.00 on treats...spend $2.00 on a cheap mask.

But for the most part the costume-less beggars were only a few in the around 250 trick or treaters (though the 50 plus year old ones always weird me out) In particular, the Playdough and the squirt guns seemed to be big hits.



Halloween 2009 )
 
 
hatter23
22 October 2009 @ 07:16 pm
I was half dozing at home when I heard a know at the door. It took me about 9 seconds to get there and I only saw the two kids that have been hanging around and skateboarding on the block.

I guess they are about 9 to 12 years old.

They asked for "early Halloween candy."

What? The? Fuck?

I stated "you get Halloween candy on Halloween" They tried to engage me in further question but I was not having any of it.

The concept of just knocking on a strangers door and asking for stuff other than on Halloween itself would never have occurred to me as a child. I knew it was rude.

Halloween is a social contract even if it is breaking the rules for a day. The small thrill of seeing people in costumes for a small payment.

Still trying to figure it out.
 
 
hatter23
12 October 2009 @ 02:36 pm
A parishoner enters a church.
     Mr. Praline: 'Ello, I wish to register a complaint.
     (The owner does not respond.)
     Mr. Praline: 'Ello, Miss?
     Parson: What do you mean "miss"?
     Mr. Praline: I'm sorry, It was the frock you are wearing. I wish
to make a complaint!
     Parson: We're closin' for lunch.
     Mr. Praline: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about
this savior I’ve been paying homage to at this very establishment
since I was born.
     Parson: Oh yes, the, uh, the Son of Yahweh...What's,uh...What's
wrong with it?
     Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's
dead, that's what's wrong with it!
     Parson: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting in ‘eaven with father.
     Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a failed savior when I see one,
and I'm looking at one right now up there on that cross. I found a
passage saying: “But I say unto you of a truth, There are some of
those standing here who shall not taste death until they shall have
seen the kingdom of God “
     Parson: No no he's not dead, he's, he's going to ‘ave a second
coming! Yahweh’s son, we got beautiful rituals
     Mr. Praline: The rituals don't enter into it. He's stone dead.
     Parson: Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting!
     Mr. Praline: All right then, if he's restin', Why I’ll just wake
him. ‘Allo Jesus wake up, I’m doubting you. You will have a saved soul
if…
     Parson: Abba abba gabble geeble! There, the spirit moved me! I
spoke in tounges!
     Mr. Praline: No, he didn't, that was you just spouting
gibberish!
     Parson I never!!
     Mr. Praline: Yes, you did!
     Parson: I never, never did anything...
     Mr. Praline: (shouting into the air) I am asking you in your name
for something, Don’t let me blaspheme! Don’t let me sully your icon.
(tears the crucifix off the wall tosses it into the air and it crashes
into the ground)
     Mr. Praline: Now that's what I call a dead Savior.
     Parson: No, no.....No, 'e's stunned!
     Mr. Praline: STUNNED?!?
     Parson: Yeah! You stunned him, With your heathen behavior.
Yaweh’s son types stun easily, major.
     Mr. Praline: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad
enough of this. That savior is definitely deceased, and when I was
going to mass here you assured me that he was just tuckered out from
saving us from our sins, two millennia ago.
     Parson: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the Dead
sea.
     Mr. Praline: PININ' for the Dead Sea?!?!?!? What kind of talk is
that?, look, why did he fail to answer any prayer that couldn’t have
happen by chance EVER!
     Parson: The Yaweh’s son prefers keepin'  it mysterious!
Remarkable savior, id'nit, squire? Lovely rituals!
     Mr. Praline: Look, I took the liberty of examining this bible
when I got it home, and I discovered it all chock full of
descrepancies. Including miscalculating Pi, saying bats are birds, and
no less than two different ways Judas died.
     (pause)
     Parson: Well, o'course it ‘as descrepancies! If it hadn't people
would think the lord isn’t mysterious and “VOOM!”
     Mr. Praline: "VOOM"?!? Mate, this savior wouldn't "voom" if you
put four million volts through it! 'E's bleedin' demised!
     Parson: No no! 'E's pining!
     Mr. Praline: 'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This savior is no
more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e
     rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the cross 'e'd be
pushing up the daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's
off the twig! 'E's kicked the
     bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain
and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!! THIS IS AN EX-SAVIOR!!
     (pause)
     Parson: Well, I'd better replace it, then
 
 
hatter23

The baffoon and hypocrit named Rush Limbaugh star has been falling, and the wacko right has found a replacement, one even more prone to lying, demogougery, and batshit insane: Glenn Beck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWPvUOEqhYo

"Im not saying he doesn't like white people" and "(He) has a deep seated hatred of white people"

Yeah, Mr Beck what a wonderful well thought out argument.  Two absolutely completely opposite statments in the same interview

Then, their is the View, which I thinks sucks, but notice this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t44yNRnoYXQ&feature=fvw

Shows Barbara Walters and Whoopi Goldberg showing him lying


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Tb_mMPD6hw

Now this one is Olbermann...who is too liberal for my tastes...but I I do admire for calling conservative idiots for what they are, idiots. Unfortunately Olberman will reach and make stretches, is occasionally hypocritical...and too often will just treat conservatives as idiots by nature, rather than by...as I believe,  that the groups conservatives and idiots are neither identical, nor exclusive of each other.

Glenn Beck called his 70,000 member 9-12 crowd as two million...that goes beyond egageration to lying.
He pulls the fake tears out every time

and oddest of all is that his first major story was about how bad the insurance industry treats patients in the hospital.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA7-BvVDV10&NR=1

Here he is unable to answer questions without freaking out and name calling

 

 
 
hatter23
19 September 2009 @ 10:31 am
Depressed because I had reserve a space at the Patterson Park flea market to sell Jewelery, but am not healed anough to comfortably move the tables, chair, easy up shelter, display cases and jewelery to sell there today, and Erin just doesn't have the upper body strength to do it herself.  I feel miserable because I could do it, but it might set me back health wise, given I am still coughing up blood in the mornings. I wanted to make some money to put towards getting the floors done, and to feel all the money and hours I put into making the thousand plus peices of jewelery wasn't in vain.

Crap.
 
 
hatter23
16 September 2009 @ 09:51 pm
I watched Mondays Daily Show, watched Fox news, and have been watching some stuff on you tube, and conservative are frankly appalling me.  Fox News is openly endorsing anti-Obamaites like never before. It has become just as biased as Democracy Now is on the left, but because corporations like the agenda, it is well funded.

I see people using Obama's middle name as a blatent attempt at associating him with terrorism. I see people calling him a socialist and putting him in pictures with Lenin. I even see people calling him Hitler.  I even read a reply to a post I made where someone said, seriously, that he is Islamic and tripled the debt in the first six months in office, statements that are patently false...not just a difference of opinion but verifiably FALSE. These are grown adults with the level of Political awareness and well though out positions that I was, on the left, leaving behing by the second semester of Sophmore high school. 

Looking at Obama's performance so far, I find him a "C-" president. Naive, promised too much, delived too little. To be fair, it is his first year, and many good Presidents first year is pretty lackluster. But given that he followed GW Bush, IMNSHO the worst president ever, makes him look sparkling by comparison. I also don't care for Obama's stance on guns and gun ownership. But GW manage to increase the debt more than any other president in history, had the most enditements for graft in history, a vast stock market plunge,  and had the first drop in median household income adjusted for inflation since the depression. Yes, he proved more disasterous for business than the much maligned Carter, and had a more corrupt cabinet than Grant. I didn't think he was going to be worse than Grant(the next worse president) but he did.  Nixon had nothing on the Bush administration.

But the same people who praised the living fuck out of the incompetent and corrupt Bush administration are just as childishly launching baseless attacks on Obama. 

The ultimate thing is, when we look for standards of living, including healthcare, the US lags behind numerous nations, all with socialized medicine but essentially slightly socialized capitalist countries.. 

I feel that my opinion is mature, only because I put evidence before doctrine. Were the evidence point that this wasn't the case, my opinion would be revised. That is why I refer to myself as a radical moderate.
 
 
hatter23
16 September 2009 @ 05:27 am
In a few minutes my mother is going to pick me up to take me to the hospital for vocal chord surgery. I know it is a minor surgery, but none the less, I am a little scared. I will not be able to talk for 5 days, or longer if something goes wrong.
 
 
hatter23
08 September 2009 @ 03:22 pm
After going out to Virginia Saturday to chase Lego peices for Erin....Yes She actually wanted to go to the lego store more than I did....Sunday I spent Cleaning the house to make it presentable for a backyard Barbeque.

After all, I got this big chunk of Fillet Mignon and had to share. Once again, I never seem to have to patience to really get charcoal going, I should really give it 70 minutes.
 
 
hatter23
25 August 2009 @ 12:22 pm


This past week Erin and myself went to the Washington DC Lego convention. Even the Badge was made out of lego with the express intent of allowing you to pimp it out.

Read more... )
 
 
hatter23
13 August 2009 @ 06:56 am

There was always a bit of a generational war going on in the SciFi circles in Baltimore. The Older ones, oft hippies, would be very disparaging of the punk and Goth youth. However, there was one exception: Hal Haag. He was always very open and fun loving. Never seemed to go out of his way to speak of any ill of anyone except his son and people who deserved it by ruining others good time or selfishness.

I knew him primarily from gaming circles. He was the link between Baltimore Science Fiction Society, BSFS and Gamers League of Baltimore Elite (GLOBE) and particularly liked of all role playing Games, Paranoia. A black Humor game about a dystopian future run by a badly programmed computer. Appealed to his dark sense of humor, his gamer side, and the fact that he worked as a computer programmer for most of the seventies and part of the eighties. He was so good at getting the humor of the game he once ran it for the writers of the game, and reduced them to tears with laughter. He also was a big fan of Car Wars, a distopian future game war game based around Cars with guns.

I kept in touch with Hal, even introducing him to Magic the Gathering after the collapse of Globe. Then he was at the forefront of getting gaming back at BSFS with the Games Club of Maryland, riding on the Eurogame boom of alternative boardgames. It was fun because he could be an exuberant winner, or a sore loser without even the slightest touch of any serious rancor or selfish pride. A man who celebrated just having a good time and tongue and cheek humor.

In a way, and I don't think he knew it, he was sort of my idealized father figure.

I found out just last night he died that morning. His continuing battles with diabetes and heart problems finally caught up with him. My life has just become a bit of a darker place. I shall miss him sorely. I just wish I could game with him again.
 
 
hatter23

Ahh yet another aopogist has sunk his teeth into sidestepping one of the most airtight, logical arguments against the existence of the Christian God. He does so by the usual, lying and illogic.

Some use this question in an attempt to "disprove" the existence of God. In fact, there is a popular anti-Christian website dedicated to the “Why won’t God heal amputees?” argument: http://www.whywontgodhealamputees.com. If God is all-powerful and if Jesus promised to do anything we ask (or so the reasoning goes), then why won’t God ever heal amputees when we pray for them? Why does God heal victims of cancer and diabetes, for example, yet He never causes an amputated limb to be regenerated? The fact that an amputee stays an amputee is "proof" to some that God does not exist, that prayer is useless, that so-called healings are coincidence, and that religion is a myth.
 
The above argument is usually presented in a thoughtful, well-reasoned way, with a liberal sprinkling of Scripture to make it seem all the more legitimate. However, it is an argument based on a wrong view of God and a misrepresentation of Scripture. The line of reasoning employed in the "why won’t God heal amputees" argument makes at least seven false assumptions:
 

Assumption 1:
God has never healed an amputee. Who is to say that in the history of the world, God has never caused a limb to regenerate? To say, "I have no empirical evidence that limbs can regenerate; therefore, no amputee has ever been healed in the history of the world" is akin to saying "I have no empirical evidence that rabbits live in my yard; therefore, no rabbit has ever lived on this ground in the history of the world." It’s a conclusion that simply cannot be drawn. Besides, we have the historical record of Jesus healing lepers, some of whom we may assume had lost digits or facial features. In each case, the lepers were restored whole (Mark 1:40-42; Luke 17:12-14). Also, there is the case of the man with the shriveled hand (Matthew 12:9-13), and the restoration of Malchus's severed ear (Luke 22:50-51), not to mention the fact that Jesus raised the dead (Matthew 11:5; John 11), which would undeniably be even more difficult than healing an amputee.

 
WRONG! The argument asks why in any circumstance recorded, has this not happened. It asks for evidence. You say about rabbit in your yard= the world. The Question doesn't just limit itself to say, Chicago. There is evidence of rabbits elsewhere, but as to magical deific, healing of amuputees, none. So Write one up to STRAWMAN

 
Assumption 2:
God’s goodness and love require Him to heal everyone. Illness, suffering, and pain are the result of our living in a cursed world—cursed because of our sin (Genesis 3:16-19; Romans 8:20-22). God’s goodness and love moved Him to provide a Savior to redeem us from the curse (1 John 4:9-10), but our ultimate redemption will not be realized until God has made a final end of sin in the world. Until that time, we are still subject to physical death.
 

If God’s love required Him to heal every disease and infirmity, then no one would ever die—because "love" would maintain everyone in perfect health. The biblical definition of love is "a sacrificial seeking what is best for the loved one." What is best for us is not always physical wholeness. Paul the apostle prayed to have his "thorn in the flesh" removed, but God said, "No" because He wanted Paul to understand he didn’t need to be physically whole to experience the sustaining grace of God. Through the experience, Paul grew in humility and in the understanding of God’s mercy and power (2 Corinthians 12:7-10).

 
The testimony of Joni Eareckson Tada provides a modern example of what God can do through physical tragedy. As a teenager, Joni suffered a diving accident that left her a quadriplegic. In her book Joni, she relates how she visited faith healers many times and prayed desperately for the healing which never came. Finally, she accepted her condition as God’s will, and she writes, "The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced that God doesn’t want everyone well. He uses our problems for His glory and our good" (p. 190).

WRONG: The question of why does God never heal amputees is not a request for a Santa God, but asks why, of all the illesses that people claim God can heal, why never, in no recorded case, this one? If God can work in cases of Cancer and other miracles attributed to him, why has no one (in recorded history) had the faith for a pass on this one?  STAWMAN.

 
Assumption 3:
God still performs miracles today just as He did in the past. In the thousands of years of history covered by the Bible, we find just four short periods in which miracles were widely performed (the period of the Exodus, the time of the prophets Elijah and Elisha, the ministry of Jesus, and the time of the apostles). While miracles occurred throughout the Bible, it was only during these four periods that miracles were "common."

 
The time of the apostles ended with the writing of Revelation and the death of John. That means that now, once again, miracles are rare. Any ministry which claims to be led by a new breed of apostle or claims to possess the ability to heal is deceiving people. "Faith healers" play upon emotion and use the power of suggestion to produce unverifiable "healings." This is not to say that God does not heal people today—we believe He does—but not in the numbers or in the way that some people claim.
 

We turn again to the story of Joni Eareckson Tada, who at one time sought the help of faith healers. On the subject of modern-day miracles, she says, "Man’s dealing with God in our day and culture is based on His Word rather than ‘signs and wonders’" (op cit., p. 190). His grace is sufficient, and His Word is sure.

 
Which is to say: he only preformed wonders when it was not easily refuted, or questioned. So did lots of gods.  Occam's razor can sure cut deep, Eh? BEGGING THE QUESTION
 
Assumption 4:
God is bound to say "yes" to any prayer offered in faith. Jesus said, "I am going to the Father. And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it" (John 14:12-14). Some have tried to interpret this passage as a carte blanche from Jesus promising His agreement to whatever we ask. But this is misreading Jesus’ intent. Notice, first, that Jesus is speaking to His apostles, and the promise is for them. After Jesus’ ascension, the apostles were given power to perform miracles as they spread the gospel (Acts 5:12). Second, Jesus twice uses the phrase "in My name." This indicates the basis for the apostles’ prayers, but it also implies that whatever they prayed for should be consonant with Jesus’ will. A selfish prayer, for example, or one motivated by greed, cannot be said to be prayed in Jesus’ name.

 
We pray in faith, but faith means that we trust God. We trust Him to do what is best and to know what is best. When we consider all the Bible’s teaching on prayer (not just the promise given to the apostles), we learn that God may exercise His power in response to our prayer, or He may surprise us with a different course of action. In His wisdom He always does what is best (Romans 8:28).

We pray because of faith, not to get things? Really, what about the prayers about the health of another? So it boils down to BEGGING THE QUESTION 


 
Assumption 5:
God’s future healing (at the resurrection) cannot compensate for earthly suffering. The truth is, "our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us" (Romans 8:18). When a believer loses a limb, he has God’s promise of future wholeness, and faith is "being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see" (Hebrews 11:4). Jesus said, "It is better for you to enter life maimed or crippled than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire" (Matthew 18:8). His words confirm the relative unimportance of our physical condition in this world, as compared to our eternal state. To enter life maimed (and then to be made whole) is infinitely better than to enter hell whole (to suffer for eternity).

Wrong: Thistrying to obfucate magical hereafter for the reality of what we can measure. RED HERRING

 
Assumption 6:
God’s plan is subject to man’s approval. One of the contentions of the "why won’t God heal amputees" argument is that God just isn’t "fair" to amputees. Yet, Scripture is clear that God is perfectly just (Psalm 11:7; 2 Thessalonians 1:5-6) and in His sovereignty answers to no one (Romans 9:20-21). A believer has faith in God’s goodness, even when circumstances make it difficult and reason seems to falter.

 
Wrong: This is a red herring, trying to obfucate  the mysterious God's plan for the reality of what we can measure. RED HERRING

 
Assumption 7:
God does not exist. This is the underlying assumption on which the whole "why won’t God heal amputees" argument is based. Those who champion the "why won’t God heal amputees" argument start with the assumption that God does not exist and then proceed to buttress their idea as best they can. For them, "religion is a myth" is a foregone conclusion, presented as a logical deduction but which is, in reality, foundational to the argument.

 
In one sense, the question of why God doesn’t heal amputees is a "gotcha" question, comparable to "Can God make a rock too big for Him to lift?" and is designed not to seek for truth but to discredit faith. In another sense, it can be a valid question with a biblical answer. That answer, in short, would be something like this: "God can heal amputees and will heal every one of them who trusts Christ as Savior. The healing will come, not as the result of our demanding it now, but in God’s own time, possibly in this life, but definitely in Heaven. Until that time, we walk by faith, trusting the God who redeems us in Christ and promises the resurrection of the body."

So you are accusing him of what every person who has ever tried a point in writing...ever...has done. BEGGING THE QUESTION
 
 
hatter23
03 August 2009 @ 07:07 am





Erin poses for a shot on the beach.

After our little 4th of July trip, Erin was itching for a real vacation at AC, by going during the week we managed to squeak it into our budget.  The first day was lovely, but the lifegaurds were very demanding, and what we used as a changing room the first time around, apparently isn't to be used for changing.
Read more... )
 
 
hatter23
31 July 2009 @ 08:06 am


After OakHill, which Erin found somewhat disappointing, we decided to try a graveyard that we've been past many times. I thought it would be uninteresting, being established in 1912. However, I was wrong. It was a bit of a bittersweet experience for me as the last time I was in that graveyard was for the burial of a good friend, fellow Iconoclast, and D&D buddy from high school who had committed suicide, Phillip Enlich.

The odd thing was some unexpected parallels to OakHill



Like Cenotaph sheltered busts

Read more... )
 
 
hatter23
29 July 2009 @ 12:18 pm


SomeBunny loves you, some bunny loves you so much that they didn't just send you their heart but the rest of  their internal organs as well.
 

The horror of Eastpoint )
 
 
hatter23
29 July 2009 @ 08:27 am


Erin and I WENT to Atlantic City on Saturday with Jon, Wes, and Cheryl for the 4th and it was actually a fairly good trip.  Even though we did get a late start, and the traffic was miserable, there was no fighting, few sour faces, and little drama.

But unfortunately between the late start and the craptastic traffic, mostly slowed up by 5 fricken tolls, we didn't get to AC until about 6:30 and I with the dipping sun, no one in the group but myself was willing to brave the cold surf.  And Erin gives me crap for being a pussy, HA!

None the less it was damn cold.

I got a few pictures:



Read more... )
 
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize